A non-zero financial commitment.
The license must include a non-zero financial commitment to donate to prosperous software projects, without self-dealing.
Of a software license: requiring its commercial users to direct a non-zero, recurring financial commitment to other prosperous software — automatically, without negotiation, and without self-dealing.
The license must include a non-zero financial commitment to donate to prosperous software projects, without self-dealing.
Prosperous software is defined as any software with a license approved by the Public Goods Foundation (PGF).
Self-dealing includes donating to other projects where you exercise a significant amount of ownership, benefits, control, or authority.
Financial commitments (e.g. revenue-sharing) must compose across licenses in a simple fashion that is easily actionable by users of the software.
All modified, extended, and derived versions of the program must also enforce a profit-left clause in its license, with a commitment requirement at least as great as the original program.
Profit-left is not a replacement for free and open source software — it is an addition to it. A prosperous license is expected to satisfy both foundational definitions in full, and then carry a profit-left clause on top.
Software is "free" when its users hold four essential freedoms:
A license is "open source" when its distribution terms meet ten criteria: